Blog

The Great Interoperability Divide

Why traditional integration engines and managed services fail modern health tech — and what a scalable alternative looks like.

Why neither legacy vendors nor managed services work for modern health tech

The Challenge

Two Bad Options and a Better One

If you're building an AI application or medical device, the interoperability landscape splits into two camps — and neither fits.

Traditional engines
Powerful, but require deep expertise, long timelines, and large budgets.

Managed services
Simplify integration, but pricing makes scaling impossible.

The gap isn’t a better tool. It’s a better model.

The Old Guard

Traditional engines like:

  • Rhapsody
  • Cloverleaf
  • InterSystems
  • Mirth

Were built for hospital IT — not startups.

Reality:

  • Expensive
  • Complex
  • Slow to implement

Managed Services

Providers like Redox and Ellkay:

Pros:

  • Faster setup
  • Reduced complexity

Cons:

  • $35K+ monthly costs
  • Limited customization
  • Poor scalability

The Real Problem

You’re choosing between:

  • Flexibility with complexity
  • Simplicity with cost

Neither scales.

The Intely Difference

Platform + Service together

  • No-code / low-code platform
  • Fully managed delivery
  • Built for AI workflows

Key Advantages

Event-driven architecture
Triggered by clinical events, not manual queries

Normalized data
Consistent across all hospitals

Write-back support
Delivers results directly into EMRs

Scales across sites
Each deployment builds on the last

Designed for AI & Medical Devices

You need:

  • Real-time triggers
  • Clean data
  • EMR write-back
  • Consistency across sites

Intely provides all of it.

Summary

Stop choosing between fast and affordable.

Choose scalable.